Undertakings (U/T)
Counsel agreed on the record to produce or provide something.
For Canadian litigation
Undertakings, under advisements and refusals — each with its page and line reference, the Q&A that produced it, and draft wording waiting for your review.
Start your free trial7 days · no credit cardP. 142, L. 8–19
To produce the complete maintenance records for the subject vehicle from 2019 to the date of loss.
Three categories, set out the way the chart conventionally is — grouped by type, with a blank response column for the other side.
Counsel agreed on the record to produce or provide something.
Taken under advisement — neither undertaken nor refused, the answer deferred.
Questions refused on the record, with the exchange that led there.
Locating the exchanges, carrying the page and line across, and drafting wording to convention is mechanical work. UT Chart does that part and hands you a chart to work from — what each item finally says is decided by the person reviewing it.
Page and line on every item, with the Q&A that produced it.
Approve the draft, revise it, or restore it — nothing is final until a reviewer says so.
Each matter has an owner and a named collaborator list, with the firm's Owner and Admin roles keeping oversight across all of it.
Select the transcript PDF as your reporter delivered it. The structure is detected per file.
Undertakings, under advisements and refusals, each with page, line and Q&A context.
Approve or revise each item's wording, then export the chart to Word.
Every item carries its reference back to the transcript.
Read the exchange without reopening the PDF.
Approve, revise, or restore the original draft.
Pending, approved, revised — the chart shows what still needs an eye.
Structure detected per file — no template to configure.
A .docx in the conventional chart format — grouped by type, blank response column.
$300CAD / seat / year
It is the chart prepared after an examination for discovery, setting out what counsel undertook to produce, what was taken under advisement, and what was refused — so both sides can track what is outstanding.
An undertaking is a commitment made on the record to produce or provide something. An under advisement is a question taken away for consideration, neither undertaken nor refused. A refusal is a question declined on the record.
UT Chart is built for Canadian litigation. Transcript structure is detected per file rather than per jurisdiction, so it does not assume one province’s reporter conventions.
The transcript’s structure is detected from the file itself, so there is no template to configure per reporter. If a transcript cannot be profiled, UT Chart tells you rather than guessing.
No. UT Chart reads the text layer of the PDF, so scanned or image-only transcripts without a text layer cannot be processed. Most transcripts delivered by reporters today carry a text layer.
AI drafts suggested wording for each item. The draft is a starting point: a reviewer approves it, revises it, or restores the original. Nothing is treated as final until a person marks it so.
Access is granted per case rather than firm-wide: a matter is visible to its owner, the collaborators explicitly added to it, and the firm's Owner and Admin users, not to everyone at the firm. Full detail on storage, encryption, retention, access roles and every third party involved is published on our Security page.
A Word .docx in the conventional chart format — grouped by type, with the standard column headings and a blank response column for the other side. The layout is fixed rather than configurable per firm.
Seats are $300 CAD per seat per year, plus applicable taxes. Seat changes are made in your firm’s billing settings in UT Chart, which states the change and its effect on your bill before you confirm it. The trial runs 7 days with no credit card, for up to 5 seats.
Free for 7 days. No credit card.
Start your free trial